TARGETING JOURNALISTS
(Article
by Meir Suissa, Kol HaZman, p.50, 14.2.2003)
[Translation provided by Israel Government Press Office]
Jerusalem-----February
17.........Al-Raya, the publication of the Islamic Jihad, printed a threatening
article against Zev Schiff. Ronen Bergman received information that a
terrorist organization knows which restaurants he frequents. Yoram Binur
was accused of collaborating with the Zionist enemy, and the ISA
increased security around another journalist's home. This is how Palestinian
terrorist organizations are attempting to tame the Israeli watchdogs of
democracy. A phenomenon.
Approximately two
weeks ago the official publication of the Islamic Jihad in Gaza, Al-Raya
(The Flag), printed a personal and reasoned column under the heading "For
Zev Schiff." The editorial of the Islamic
Jihad mouthpiece chose to refer directly to the writings of the military
correspondent of the Ha'aretz newspaper, Zev Schiff, demonstrating their
expertise in the material as it is presented and read by the other side.
Israel is still surprised to discover, each time, the degree to which
the Palestinians are familiar with Israeli politics, society and media.
Israeli media personalities, those who cover events in the Territories,
are no longer surprised. For Schiff, this was a theoretical debate. In
response to the text he had written about the failure of the intifada,
Al-Raya decided to try and use words to prove it has succeeded. "Ehud
Ya'ari came to me two weeks ago and said there was an article in the Islamic
Jihad publication about what I had written," Schiff says. "This
isn't new for me. They read and are interested more than we think.
Today they are trying to win over Israeli journalists, and they want to
reach as much of the Israeli public as possible, so as to compete for
public
opinion."
Schiff speaks of winning
over and interest, even though the Palestinian terrorist organizations
have decided, at this point in time, to operate in other ways as well,
with regard to the bodies that cover them. Much
of the evidence that has been gathered testifies to their following journalists,
some of whom have become outright targets. Recently a senior member of
the Islamic Jihad was arrested for planning to assassinate an Israeli
reporter. Details of the incident are classified, but according to the
indictment it appears that the organization had the reporter's personal
details, including photos of him, his home address and that of his family,
his workplace, and the restaurants he frequents.
The journalist received specific information from the ISA concerning the
arrest of the Islamic Jihad member, and was briefed accordingly. Today
he carries a weapon and his home is well protected.
Two months ago a worldwide
terror network was exposed, which was activated by the Al-Aksa Martyrs'
Brigade. The organization, based in Nablus, was instructed by activists
abroad to listen into the
conversations of another Israeli journalist and record them. The terrorist
cell obeyed the instructions: Its members tapped into the reporter's conversations
for ten days, and at the end of the mission the
tapes were sent to the operators overseas to be transcribed. These are
only two examples, but they are not the only reporters who are presently
in the firing line of terror's new front.
Security and ISA
briefings
Up until a year and
a half ago, journalist Moshe Cohen served as Channel One's reporter in
the Territories. He decided to retire after working for six and a half
years. "A year and a half ago I was told unofficially
that someone intended to kidnap me," he recounts. "The source
who passed the information along to me was a known Israeli source, but
the way in which the information was given was unofficial. When the current
intifada broke out, it was made clear to me that people from the Fatah
Tanzim in Bethlehem intend to kidnap me and murder me. In light of that
information I decided to take several steps: I decided to spend as
little time as possible in the Territories, in order to reduce the amount
of contact and conflict. At the same time, I updated the Israel Broadcasting
Authority's security officer and was given a secure parking
space, as well as other means aimed at protecting me. The information
given to me referred to an attempt on my life, with my name mentioned
specifically, along with that of a journalist from a large national newspaper.
"This, of course,
is a very unpleasant feeling. You keep a low profile for several weeks
until the anger subsides, and you hope the threat is not concrete. There's
nothing you can do, this is the type of work I do,
you take this kind of risk. Soldiers and settlers are always being targeted,
now reporters, too. The Al-Qaeda organization is inclined to boast of
its intentions to kidnap foreign journalists, like Daniel Pearl
who was murdered in Afghanistan. The picture of a famous journalist being
held captive is just as powerful as that of a senior officer being kidnapped.
In terms of the shock value it can generate, it is similar to
a terrorist attack with numerous victims."
Ronen Bergman, a reporter
for Yediot Ahronot and author of the book, Authority Given about the Palestinian
Authority, discovered five years ago that he was under constant surveillance
by Islamic Jihad activists.
Details relating to Bergman were found in one of the organization's offices
in Gaza, including places where he spent time, telephone numbers of his
family members and some of his friends, his home address and
other details about him. In light of the genuine threat to his life, Bergman
was briefed by ISA personnel. "This incident, as far as I'm concerned,
has never ended," he said this week. "I know it had a beginning,
but I don't know what it has in store for me."
In his book, Bergman
exposed the extent of the widespread corruption among senior officials
in the Palestinian Authority, and he backs up his findings with dozens
of testimonies and classified documents. "One month before the book
was published I received generalized threats. I didn't panic, I'm used
to this, and I don't react to every piece of information. Six years ago
I received a notice from the ISA that during
a raid conducted by the IDF and the ISA they found many details about
me in one of the Jihad offices, including my father's phone number (who
was one of the first scientists at the Dimona Reactor - MS). I don't know
what they did with the information they collected on me. In any case,
I am taking a series of security measures in light of that information.
Even when I was writing my book I received messages from agents on the
Palestinian side, who wanted me to stop writing it. The threats were generalized,
in contrast with the details found in Gaza, where intelligence work was
used to gather the information."
How can you explain
the fact that journalists have become a target for terrorists?
"First of all
a terrorist organization, by its very nature, must always invest resources
in gathering intelligence on-line about interesting figures who are gaining
power, about various social developments, etc.
Since the Palestinian Authority has come into power, it understands the
importance of intelligence gathering. Jibril Rajoub's Preventive Security
Organization used to operate a unit that dealt specifically
with wiretaps and intelligence gathering. Regarding journalists, the truth
is I don't understand what good it does them. I don't understand why the
organization sought me out specifically, I don't understand what
good it would have done in trying to take me out. Their agenda doesn't
mention the word 'reporter' as a preferred target."
Yoram Binur, Channel
Two's reporter for Arab affairs sounds much more disturbed from the growing
and apparent tendency. "The fact the Israeli journalists, along with
academic researchers dealing with the
Palestinian issue, are being threatened, is very frightening," he
says. "There is a serious danger here that jeopardizes the freedom
of expression in Israel. It is a very serious situation that must not
be
tolerated. The offensive intervention of terrorist organizations, with
the intention of threatening and influencing the words of Israeli reporters,
is crossing a red line. There is clear evidence of the terrorist cells'
abilities to threaten and carry out their threats. If Israeli journalists
become threatened on a regular basis, that breaks the consensus that existed
here for years. We must not belittle their military capabilities. They
have shown us more than once just what they are capable of. The activists
sent out on these missions carry them out with all the loyalty and professionalism
of the elite commando unit."
What broke the consensus?
Why have journalists become the enemy in the eyes of the terrorist organizations?
Binur: "We need
to focus on one important point: the Israeli media, particularly during
the current intifada, is perceived in the eyes of Palestinian opinion
as collaborators. Israeli journalists have been considered during recent
years as cooperating with the establishment, a kind of messenger of the
Zionist regime. In the opinion of everyone in the Territories, the Israeli
press has been recruited on behalf of the government. In contrast with
the prevailing approach in Israel, which actually believes that the Israeli
press is left-wing, they perceive Israeli reporters as ambassadors of
the Zionist state. In the previous intifada, the Israeli journalists served
as a mouthpiece for the occupied people. Today things are different."
Foreign journalists
remain silent
Today, the importance
of the media in waging worldwide wars is also clear to the Palestinians,
who are trying, as is the Israeli side, to influence public opinion through
the press and mainly through the television screen. Binur asserts that
"the Palestinian side is very involved today, and interested in everything
that happens in Israel.
There is an acceptance of the press's power in shaping public opinion.
The Palestinian people are aware of the fact that opinion pieces are being
written in Israel that have the power to affect leaders in Israel, and
the terror organizations are trying to take aim at this arena as well.
The purpose of a terror attack is to influence public opinion and intimidate.
An attack on a journalist or an attempt to intimidate him could also turn
into legitimate means. The Palestinian public is an alert public, which
reads and takes interest. I always say that every average Palestinian
reads more and is more interested than the average Israeli. They read
every word, they are political public like no other.
The Palestinian Authority is also aware of the power of the Israeli media:
There are people at the Palestinian Ministry of Information who translate
the Israeli papers every day. They thirst for every bit of information."
What should a journalist
do if he discovers there is a threat to his life?
Binur: "In my
opinion, if an Israeli journalist has received threats and still chooses
to continue writing under the threat, he must report this to his superiors,
so that they know he is writing in such a situation.
It is simply a matter of professional ethics. Suspicions in the territories
today are at a peak level, everyone thinks that his neighbor is a collaborator.
If you enter the territories as a journalist who comes to carry out a
routine investigation, and a day later soldiers from an undercover unit
arrive at the scene, alight from a van and shoot two Palestinians in the
head, it is clear that they will believe there is a connection between
the events."
Binur bases this on
a personal incident, which happened at the end of last year. About three
months ago, he held an interview in Jenin with three senior terror operatives.
Several weeks later, the ISA tracked down one of the interviewees, and
he was assassinated in his hiding place. Following the incident Binur
received threats to his life that compelled him to take safety precautions,
regarding which he is unwilling to expand.
Danny Seaman, director
of the Government Press Office, confirms that the new phenomenon of threatening
the lives of journalists is well known.
"The past two years have seen the rules of the game change,"
says Seaman. "Only a week ago, the vehicle of the Al-Jazeera bureau
chief in the West Bank was blown up. The atmosphere in the territories
is
unfavorable towards anything that is incompatible with the media propaganda
messages of the Palestinian Authority. I know that there are threats to
the lives of journalists, the situation in the territories is terrible.
As a result the IDF Spokesperson has had to limit entry of (Israeli) journalists.
Luckily, Israeli journalists have an
extraordinary talent for improvisation, and they succeed in relaying updates
from there despite the limitations. This is a badge of honor for us. The
Israeli journalists work under a regime of 'media terror,' but
they pass the test in a praiseworthy fashion. Regrettably, the foreign
press does not stand up and protest this. They feel no moral obligation
towards their Israeli colleagues, and prefer to remain silent."
A senior source in
the GPO chooses to express severe criticism of the collegiality displayed
by the foreign journalists in the territories:
"We discovered that Hamas and Islamic Jihad members, employed by
the foreign news agencies, confronted Israelis working there in order
to prevent a particular story from being aired. We came across such cases
more than once at Jerusalem Capital Studios. The PA succeeds, with the
assistance of the foreign media, in creating a situation where the information
relayed abroad is convenient for it. Those who remain isolated in this
media arena are the Israeli journalists, and they are the ones who are
now forced to deal with this massive pressure that is only worsening."
A senior IDF source
said in response that "we are aware of the fact that the lives of
journalists covering the territories are in danger. The IDF enables the
entry of journalists in A areas, when they sign a statement
consenting to the fact the IDF cannot guarantee their personal safety
in these areas."
Sources in the Prime
Minister's Office said in response that "during the past two years,
many warnings have accumulated regarding attacks against Israelis, including
journalists (Israeli and foreign) and additional
parties. In most cases, the elements behind this activity were arrested
and questioned, and indictments were filed accordingly. In other cases,
steps were taken to prevent or obstruct the planned activity, within the
routine activity of the security forces."
"In each case
where concrete information was received, it was immediately relayed for
the information and care of all relevant agencies, and the necessary operative
measures were taken. No more can be said beyond that, for understandable
reasons."
|