Psychology
Today Research To Child Custody Divorce Courts, Father's
Rights Groups: Dads Are Equal

Israeli
fathers are allowed to carry M-16's but not their children.
By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency
Jerusalem ----June 3 ...... It was not easy writing the above
headline. But when Psychology Today, one of the most
respected lay journals on clinical psychology releases research
illustrating that fathers are empowered biologically no differently
than women when it comes to nurturing children, all keywords
are needed.
The
Psychological Today story: The Making of a Modern
Dad, by Douglas Carlton Abrams illustrates in vivid, scientific
detail how fathers are no different in their biological programming
than mothers when raising children. That divorced dads who "feel"
a need to be with their children, is not only an emotional reaction
but a biological one as well.
This
evidence hits hard at social workers, family court judges and
elected legislators who abide by archaic research and outdated
laws which state that it is in the best interest of the child
to be with the divorced mother - not the divorced father.
"Here
is the first hard evidence that men are biologically prepared
for fatherhood," says Psychology Today. "In
fact, this is the first evidence that to nurture is part of
man's nature."
This
medical evidence would explain why father's rights groups such
as Fathers 4 Justice in England, the US, Italy and in Israel
would risk getting arrested in their high profile protests to
see their children with equal access.
The
research, which clearly illustrates how a father biologically
responds to the birth of his children, also explains why thousands
of men become clinically depressed when separated from their
children to the point of actually committing suicide.
Perhaps
the 1979 Dustin Hoffman movie Kramer Vs. Kramer was society's
first major wake up call that dads were no different in wanting
to care and protect their children. Years passed since the making
of that landmark film where hundreds of thousands of caring,
loving and responsible dads were separated from their children
by narcissistic mothers, social workers and family court judges.
These
city appointed social workers and family court judges who believed
that it was best for the children to be with their mothers were
totally unaware of the devastating effects of their actions.
Rather than encouraging the dads to be dads, they alienated
an entire generation of fathers who simply gave up in trying
to fight the system. Perverted governmental systems which supported
the few moms (most mothers encourage unlimited or equal contact)
who used their small children as potent emotional weapons against
their former husbands as the national and local governments
practiced gender bias discrimination.
| "Here
is the first hard evidence that men are biologically prepared
for fatherhood," says Psychology Today. "In
fact, this is the first evidence that to nurture is part
of man's nature." |
The
results of a survey based on pooled data from 80,000 adults
suggest that parental divorce has an adverse effect on children's
lives compared with those raised in intact two-parent families,
adults who experienced a parental divorce had lower psychological
well-being, more behavioral problems, less education, lower
job status, a lower standard of living, lower marital satisfaction,
a heightened risk of divorce, a heightened risk of being a single
parent, and poorer physical health.
The
view that children adapt readily to divorce and show no lingering
negative consequences is clearly inconsistent with the cumulative
research in this area.
Some
studies show that children who experience the death of a parent
exhibit problems similar to those of children who 'lose' a parent
through divorce. These findings support the view that the absence
of a parent for any reason is problematic for children.
Each
year, over 1 million American children suffer the divorce of
their parents; moreover, half of the children born this year
to parents who are married will see their parents divorce before
they turn 18. Mounting evidence in social science journals demonstrates
that the devastating physical, emotional, and financial effects
that divorce is having on these children will last well into
adulthood and affect future generations. Among these broad and
damaging effects are the following.
Children whose parents have divorced are increasingly the victims
of abuse. They exhibit more health, behavioral, and emotional
problems, are involved more frequently in crime and drug abuse,
and have higher rates of suicide.
Children of divorced parents perform more poorly in reading,
spelling, and math. They also are more likely to repeat a grade
and to have higher drop-out rates and lower rates of college
graduation.
Families with children that were not poor before the divorce
see their income drop as much as 50 percent. Almost 50 percent
of the parents with children that are going through a divorce
move into poverty after the divorce.
Religious worship, which has been linked to better health, longer
marriages, and better family life, drops after the parents divorce.
The
divorce of parents, even if it is amicable, tears apart the
fundamental unit of American society. Today, according to the
US Federal Reserve Board's 1995 Survey of Consumer Finance,
only 42 percent of children aged 14 to 18 live in a "first
marriage" family--an intact two-parent married family.
It should be no surprise to find that divorce is having such
profound effects on society.
Restoring
the importance of marriage to society and the welfare of children
will require politicians and civic leaders to make this one
of their most important tasks. It also will require a modest
commitment of resources to pro-marriage programs.
A 2004
UK study confirmed that children who have contact with their
fathers following a family break-up suffer fewer behavioral
problems than those who don't have such contact.
The
researchers found that children who have a close relationship
with their natural father after their parents divorce "are
likely to be less disorderly, anxious or aggressive," according
to a summary published in the Manchester News. They also found
that children who had infrequent or no contact with their non-resident
fathers "were more likely to externalise and internalise
problems".
Last
year, The New York Times addressed father's and children's
rights in it's Sunday Magazine cover story: The Rise of the
Fathers' Custody Movement. The news story focused on the
struggle of divorced dads in both the UK and the US to gain
shared parenting, equal access and or joint custody with their
children.
Divorced
fathers and their children in Israel presently suffer from gender
bias discrimination by the Israel Knesset, family courts, the
police and local child welfare departments. Blatant discrimination
and the forced separation of father from child stems from an
outdated law passed by the Israel Knesset in 1962.
The Family Custodian Act of 1962 clearly states that all children
under the age of six will automatically have custody under their
mother, unless the mother is violent, drug abuser or negligent.
Joint
custody in Israel is rare. Most couples who divorce in Israel
find it difficult to decide on anything together. Without the
cooperation of both parents in Israel, their is no joint custody
or shared parenting. Israel family courts will only accept joint
custody arrangements when both sides agree. The father is cast
away by the mother, the justice and child welfare systems in
Israel as a second class citizen. The dad turns into a "cash
machine" paying child support every month while being denied
equal access to their children. As a result, children become
alienated from their fathers suffering from Parental Child Alienation
Syndrome, crying from the immediate and long term adverse behavioral
effects of divorce and separation for years to come.
The
Israel Fathers Rights Association, Horut Shava, Fathers
4 Justice Israel and the Israel Fathers Advocacy Council
with the aid of several leading and respected child psychologists
are now preparing material and expert testimony for the Knesset
to change a law from 1962 which has destroyed the basic civil
rights of both divorced fathers and children.
A final
note from this writer before we review the findings of Psychology
Today's latest research.
I am at my computer writing this Internet news story about divorced
fathers and their children. Your children and mine. I could
be surfing Jdate or another online dating service. But I gather
that my testosterone
level is kind of low or simply that my biological love for my
kids and seeing all parents with their children outweighs any
other earthly concern.
The
following is from Psychology Today:
When his wife gave birth, Hudnut arranged his practice so he
could be home to take care of his son, Seamus, two days a week;
he sees patients on the other three workdays. "It was a
very natural
transition," he reports. "I'm grateful to have the
opportunity my father never had."
Part
of a new generation of men who are redefining fatherhood and
masculinity, Hudnut, who is 33, is unwilling to accept the role
of absentee provider that his father's generation assumed. With
mothers
often being the breadwinners of the family, many young fathers
are deciding that a man's place can also be in the homepart-time
or even full-time.
According
to census figures, one in four dads takes care of his preschooler
during the time the mother is working. The number of children
who are raised by a primary-care father is now more than 2
million and counting. By all measures, fathers, even those who
work full-time, are more involved in their children's lives
than ever before. According to the Families and Work Institute
in New York City,
fathers now provide three-fourths of the child care mothers
do, up from one-half 30 years ago.
Is
father nurture natural?
Many
men and women wonder if all of this father care is really natural.
According to popular perceptions, men are supposedly driven
by their hormones (primarily testosterone) to compete for status,
to
seek out sex and even to be violentconditions hardly conducive
to raising kids. A recent article in Reader's Digest, "Why
Men Act As They Do," is subtitled "It's the Testosterone,
Stupid." Calling the
hormone "a metaphor for masculinity," the article
concludes, "...testosterone correlates with risk: physical,
criminal, and personal." Don't men's testosterone-induced
chest-beating and risk-taking limit their ability to cradle
and comfort their children?
Two
Canadian studies suggest that there is much more to masculinity
than testosterone. While testosterone is certainly important
in driving men to conceive a child, it takes an array of other
hormones
to turn men into fathers. And among the best fathers, it turns
out, testosterone levels actually drop significantly after the
birth of a child. If manhood includes fatherhood, which it does
for a majority of
men, then testosterone is hardly the ultimate measure of masculinity.
In
fact, the second of the two studies, which was recently published
in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings, suggests that fathers have higher
levels of estrogen the well-known female sex hormone - than
other
men. The research shows that men go through significant hormonal
changes alongside their pregnant partners changes most likely
initiated by their partner's pregnancy and ones that even cause
some
men to experience pregnancylike symptoms such as nausea and
weight gain. It seems increasingly clear that just as nature
prepares women to be committed moms, it prepares men to be devoted
dads.
"I
have always suspected that fatherhood has biological effects
in some, perhaps all, men," says biologist Sue Carter,
distinguished professor at the University of Maryland. "Now
here is the first hard
evidence that men are biologically prepared for fatherhood."
The
studies have the potential to profoundly change our understanding
of families, of fatherhood and of masculinity itself. Being
a devoted parent is not only important but also natural for
men. Indeed, there
is evidence that men are biologically involved in their children's
lives from the beginning.
Do
men's hormones change in preparation for fatherhood?
Is
biology destiny for dads?
It's
well known that hormonal changes caused by pregnancy encourage
a mother to love and nurture her child. But it has long been
assumed that a father's attachment to his child is the result
of a more
uncertain process, a purely optional emotional bonding that
develops over time, often years. Male animals in some species
undergo hormonal changes that prime them for parenting. But
do human dads? The two studies, conducted at Memorial University
and Queens University in Canada, suggest that human dads do.
In
the original study, published in Evolution and Human Behavior,
psychologist Anne Storey and her colleagues took blood samples
from 34 couples at different times during pregnancy and shortly
after birth. The researchers chose to monitor three specific
hormones because of their links to nurturing behavior in human
mothers and in animal fathers.
The
first hormone, prolactin, gets its name from the role it plays
in promoting lactation in women, but it also instigates parental
behavior in a number of birds and mammals. Male doves who are
given prolactin start brooding and feeding their young, Storey
found that in human fathers, prolactin levels rise by approximately
20 percent during the three weeks before their partners give
birth.
The
second hormone, cortisol, is well known as a stress hormone,
but it is also a good indicator of a mother's attachment to
her baby. New mothers who have high cortisol levels can detect
their own infant by odor more easily than mothers with lower
cortisol levels. The mothers also respond more sympathetically
to their baby's cries and describe their relationship with their
baby in more positive terms. Storey and her colleagues found
that for expectant fathers, cortisol was twice as
high in the three weeks before birth than earlier in the pregnancy.
Biologist
Katherine Wynne-Edwards, who conducted the research with Storey,
explains that while cortisol is seen as the "fight or flight"
hormone, it might more accurately be described as the
"heads-up-eyes-forward-something-really-important-is-happening"
hormone. It may help prepare parents for approaching birth.
Cortisol levels normally increase in women as pregnancy advances;
indeed, a cumulative rise in stress-hormone levels sets off
labor and delivery.
The
third hormone, testosterone, is abundant in male animals during
mating but decreases during nurturing. If bird fathers are given
testosterone, they spend more time defending their territory
and
mating than taking care of existing offspring. Research has
shown that human males experience a surge in testosterone when
they win sporting events and other competitions.
In
Storey's study, testosterone levels plunged 33 percent in fathers
during the first three weeks after birth. Levels then returned
to normal by the time the babies were four to seven weeks old.
However
brief the dip in testosterone, it may have effects that endure
for the life of the child. According to University of California
at Riverside psychologist Ross Parke, it may "let the nurturing
side of men come to center stage." The dip may set in motion
the more-cooperative, less-competitive enterprise of parenting.
By encouraging fathers to interact with their kids, this brief
hormonal change might actually
induce the bonding process.
Estrogen
and the daddy brain
Wynne-Edwards
and graduate student Sandra Berg designed another study to test
Storey and Wynne-Edwards' earlier findings, They measured the
hormone levels of the fathers over a longer period of time and
incorporated into the study a control group of men who had never
had children. The control group was matched by age, season and
time of day testedall of which can affect hormone levels.
Finally, by using saliva samples instead of blood draws, they
were able to test the fathers and the men in the control group
much more frequently.
In
addition to confirming the earlier findings for testosterone
reduction and cortisol change, the researchers also found that
the fathers had elevated levels of estrogen. The increase started
30 days
before birth and continued during all 12 weeks of testing after
birth.
Although estrogen is best known as a female sex hormone, it
exists in small quantities in men, too. Animal studies show
that estrogen can induce nurturing behavior in males.
Acting
in the brain as well as in other parts of the body, estrogen
in men, and testosterone in women, makes humans extremely versatile
behaviorally. "We spend an awful lot of time looking for
differences
between the sexes and trumpeting them when we find them,"
observes Wynne-Edwards, "but our brains are remarkably
similar, built from the same DNA."
In
fact, going into the study, Wynne-Edwards predicted that the
"daddy brain" would use the same nerve circuits, triggered
by many of the same hormones, as the "mommy brain."
"If Mother Nature wanted to turn on parental behavior in
a male," she reasoned, "the easiest thing would be
to turn on pathways already there for maternal behavior."
The
studies also found that a father's hormonal changes closely
paralleled those of his pregnant partner.
The
intimacy effect
The
researchers believe that intimate contact and communication
between partners may induce the hormonal changes that encourage
a father to nurture his children. Storey explains, "My
best guess is
that women's hormone levels are timed to the birthand
men's hormone levels are tied to their partners."
Exactly
how this occurs is unknown. There may be actual physiological
signals exchanged between partners in close contact, such as
the transmission of pheromones. Similar to odors, pheromones
are volatile chemical substances that animals constantly give
off through their skin or sweat but that are undetectable. Pheromones
can stimulate specific reactionsespecially matingin
other animals. Think of a female dog in heat attracting all
those barking mate dogs in the neighborhood.
Classic
studies show that menstruation is communicated, and synchronized,
through pheromones among dorm mates in college. If women in
dorms respond to one another's pheromones, then a man and a
woman who share intimate space could certainly communicate chemical
messages. These pheromones could biologically cue a man that
his partner is pregnant and kick off the hormonal changes that
prompt him to be a dad in deed as well as in seed. Pregnancy
certainly could, in
fact, be signaled.
The
level of intimacy within a couple seems to be a factor in how
a mother's body chemically signals approaching birth to a father.
All of the men tested were living with their pregnant partners.
Emotional
closeness may also generate hormonal changes, although this
possibility was not examined in detail. Still, couples reported
feeling closer to their partner if they were taking about the
baby and
sharing details about the pregnancy.
Whether
this is the cause or the result of hormonal changes remains
unknown for now. But the intimacy effect and the subsequent
hormonal shifts may also be the reason many men experience pregnancylike
symptoms.
Honey,
we're pregnant
When
he is not taking care of Seamus, Hudnut treats both men and
women in his practice. He recalls several patients who came
to him complaining of such typical pregnancy symptoms as weight
gain and
nauseaall of whom were men. He remembers one second-time
father who knew that his wife was pregnant even before she told
him. He started having morning sickness, just as he had during
her first pregnancy.
Pregnancy
symptoms in men are actually more common than most people believe.
Two studies found that approximately 90 percent of men experience
at least one pregnancy-related symptom, sometimes severe enough
to prompt an expectant father to seek medical help.
According
to a study reported in Annals of External Medicine, more than
20 percent of men with pregnant wives sought care for symptoms
related to pregnancy "that could not otherwise be objectively
explained." Unfortunately, like pregnancy symptoms in women,
there is little that can be done to make the symptoms go awayexcept
wait.
Pregnancy
symptoms in men, however well documented, are generally dismissed
as being all in the father-to-be's head. Now it seems they may
also be in his hormones. Storey and her colleagues found that
the men who experienced more pregnancy symptoms actually had
higher levels
of prolactin. They also had a greater reduction in testosterone
after exposure to sounds of crying and other "infant cues"
that simulated the experience of being with an actual baby.
For
men who feel nauseated or gain weight, no one yet knows for
sure whether the changes in hormones are to blame. Surging hormones,
however, have long been blamed for women's morning sickness
and other pregnancy side effects. The fact that men also experience
hormone
changes suggests it is more than empathy that causes many of
them to feel their partner's pain.
Changed
by a child
While
it now seems a father may accompany his wife on her hormonal
roller coaster during pregnancy, interacting with the baby may
keep his hormones spinning even after the birth.
It's
no secret that hormone levels can change in response to behavior.
Sex, sports and work success can all send testosterone production
spiraling upward. Might not nurturing a child -- or conversely,
the sight, sound and smell of a newborn -- also change fathers'
levels of
testosterone?
In
the original study, the researchers asked couples to hold dolls
that had been wrapped in receiving blankets worn by a newborn
within the preceding 24 hours. (After their wives gave birth,
fathers held
their actual baby.) They listened to a six-minute tape of a
real newborn crying and then watched a video of a baby struggling
to breast-feed. The investigators took blood from the men and
women
before the test and 30 minutes later.
What
they found is startling: Men who expressed the greatest desire
to comfort the crying baby had the highest prolactin levels
and the greatest reduction in testosterone. And testosterone
levels plummeted
in those men who held the doll for the full half-hour.
Even
though scientists have long observed changes in animal and human
behavior as a result of shifting hormone levels, they do not
yet understand exactly how hormones accomplish such change.
The
hormone-behavior link remains one of the great mysteries of
the brain.
Perhaps hormones stimulate more neuron connections in the part
of the brain responsible for nurturing. Or perhaps hormones
encourage neurons in nurturing pathways to fire more quickly.
Wynne-Edwards
thinks hormones might turn a two-lane pathway in the father's
brain into a four-lane superhighway. A neural road expansion
might make fathers better able to recognize the smell or sound
of their baby. It might even act on smell receptors in the nose
to mitigate the smell of a baby's dirty diaper. Countless are
the ways in which hormones could influence a father's brain
to be more responsive to his baby.
Home
on the range
Although
testosterone may be the "primary" male sex hormone,
research makes it clear that other hormones are also significant,
especially during the transition into fatherhood Wynne-Edwards
believes the research is "a validation of the experiences
that men know they have
had. It also goes a long way to bumping testosterone off its
pedestal as the only hormone that is important to men."
Parke
believes that the research suggests something even more radical:
"Men are much more androgynous than we think. We have the
capability to be aggressive and nurturing. The traditional view
of men as predominantly aggressive really sells men short and
denies their capability to experience the range of human emotions.
The
research suggests that a man's hormones may play an important
role in helping him experience this full range of emotions especially
in becoming a loving and devoted dad. In fact, it offers the
first
evidence that to nurture is part of man's nature.




