By
Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency
Updated February 25
London
--- February 16, 2009...... Responding to UK Lord Nazir Ahmed
threats to mobilize 10,000 Jihadists against the English Parliament,
Ahmed's calls to arrest British Jews and his murder of a British
father of two small children, both Jewish and Christian activists
have created a Facebook group demanding that Ahmed be removed
from the House of Lords.
The
Remove
Lord Ahmed From The UK House of Lords - Preserve Democracy Facebook
group states: "Lord Nazir Ahmed, who was born in Mirpur
(Azad Kashmir, Pakistan) has been a UK Labour Party life member
since 1998. He was the first Muslim to have been so honoured.
Nazir Ahmeds behaviour matters, both in the message it
sends to his fellow Muslims and in what it represents to the
rest of us.
On
25 July 2005 Lord Ahmed, while interviewing with Robert Siegel
on National Public Radio said that the suicide bombers of 7/7
had an "identity crisis" and, that "unfortunately,
our imams and mosques have not been able to communicate the
true message of Islam in the language that these young people
can understand."
Christopher
Orlet of The American Spectator did not agree with Lord
Ahmed's "identity crisis." He said, "That's not
an identity crisis, Lord Ahmed, that's religious psychopathy.
That's a bloodthirstiness that makes Dracula look like a teetotaler."
Any
person, however ennobled, who threatens to bring a horde of
10,000 Muslims upon Parliament in order to stifle debate and
bully it into submission is no moderate.
By threatening this, Lord Ahmed has shown himself to be one
of the very extremists he purports to eschew, committed to the
same ideology as those who seek to impose Sharia law upon
the UK and subjugate the kuffar to the will of Allah. He is
of the very mindset of those imams imported from Pakistan who
poison the minds of Britains Muslim youth and distort
the teachings of the Quran for their own warped ends.
Ahmed
is an arrogant bully, manifestly used to getting his own way,
and he lords it over their Lordships to the extent that his
religio-political adherence exhorts him to do so.
Lord
Ahmed is guilty of treason.
"If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom...
order to put any force or constraint upon or in order to intimidate
or overawe both Houses or either House of Parliament... and
such compassings, imaginations, inventions, devices, or intentions,
or any of them, shall express, utter, or declare, by publishing
any printing or writing... or by any overt act or deed, every
person so offending shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted
thereof shall be liable...to be transported beyond the seas
for the term or his or her natural life."
Lord
Ahmed, has not only taken aim at Salmon Rushdie and Dutch MP
Geert Wilders for exposing global Islamic Jihad but is openly
advocating the arrest of British Jews who support Israel.
Lastly,
Ahmed is a murderer.
Lord Ahmed, 51, was given a 12-week sentence yesterday for dangerous
driving, as his Jaguar crashed into a stationary car on the
M1, killing Martyn Gombar, 28, a father of two.
Ahmed
was told by a judge that the five texts he sent and received
during an 18-mile journey represented prolonged bad driving
involving deliberate disregard for the safety of others.
Yes,
Ahmed, who was expelled by the Labour Party, certainly does
have a deliberate disregard for the safety of others.
Lord
Ahmed represents Sharia law, not English law.
He is a direct and immediate threat to democracy and freedom
in the UK. He must be removed from Parliament.
Please
forward this Facebook room to your family, friends and the media."
"Lord
Nazir Ahmed entered into the UK House of Lords in the same manner
that the Trojan Horse had entered into the city of Troy,"
says Facebook group co-creator Monique Lester.
"Islamic
Jihad is performed in a variety of ways. Lord Ahmed arrived
at Parliament by the appointment of Tony Blair. He came holding
flowers and handing out sweets appearing as a "moderate
Muslim." Today, his true colours are showing. Ahmed's sense
of 'free speech' is perverted. He allows Swedish-domiciled anti-Semite
Jöran Jermas to speak filth about the Jews but when one
wants to discuss Islamic terrorism he is ready to use violence
to make sure that it is not heard. To threaten Parliament with
over 10,000 Islamic protesters to stifle free speech on the
subjects of the 9/11 and 7/7 London bombing terror attacks is
a serious and treasonous offense."
Hamas supporting Ahmed was responding to a member of the England
House of Lords to invite colleagues to a private meeting in
a conference room in the House of Lords to meet the Dutch politician
Geert Wilders. Wilders is an elected member of the Dutch parliament
who was invited to screen his anti-terrorism movie Fitna.
Wilders
branded the British Government the biggest bunch of cowards
in Europe after he flew in to Heathrow and was promptly
put on the first plane back.
"I
am going to Great Britain because I was invited by another politician
[the UKIP peer Lord Pearson of Rannoch]. I am a democrat. I
am serving freedom of speech. They are not only being nasty
to me, they are being nasty to freedom of speech. They are more
Chamberlain than Churchill," said Wilders.
The
MP had been invited to attend a showing of his 17-minute film
at the House of Lords by Lord Pearson. The film features verses
from the Koran with images of terrorist attacks in New York,
London and Madrid, and calls on Muslims to remove hate-preaching
verses from the text. Lord Pearson said that the screening would
go ahead regardless.
The
decision to refuse Wilders entry provoked Maxime Verhagen, the
Dutch Foreign Minister, to call David Miliband, the UK Foreign
Secretary, to protest against the decision. The fact that
a Dutch parliamentarian is refused entry to another EU country
is highly regrettable, Mr Verhagen said.
"Ahmed's
actions have transcended his acts of spitting on Salmon Rushdie
and Dutch
MP Geert Wilders, says UK resident Lester. "He is now inciting
hatred and violence against the Jews of Britain. In his racial
discrimination, he is calling the government to arrest those
Jews who have helped to defend the state of Israel. The Jews
of Israel have been the innocent victims of Islamic Jihad and
Hamas in Gaza who have slammed Israel cities and towns with
over 8,000 missiles. Hamas attacked Israel even though it left
Gaza in a unilateral peace move three years ago. And now that
the Israel Defense Forces have lifted up their hand to defend
their civilian populations from terror attacks, Ahmed calls
this basic and rational means of self-defense as 'criminal acts.'
The global and British Jewish and Christian communities will
not tolerate Ahmed's acts of incitement. Ahmed should be well
aware that the Jews of 2009 are not the same Jews who quietly
walked into gas chambers in the 1940's. The man deserves to
be arrested and expelled from Parliament."
Lord
Ahmed was considered to be a moderate Muslim. The
Pakistan born Nazir Ahmed became the United Kingdoms first
Muslim life peer in 1998. He is a member of the Labour Party
and was appointed to the Lords by Tony Blair. Lord Ahmed took
his oath on the Koran. He led one of the first delegations on
behalf of the British Government on the Muslim pilgrimage of
the Hajj, to Saudi Arabia. In February 2005, Lord Ahmed hosted
an inciteful, hate smitten book launch in the House of Lords
for anti-Zionist author Israel Shamir. In 2007, he responded
to the award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie by stating that
he was appalled, saying that Rushdie had blood on his
hands.
The
Times states: "Again and again we are told that
Islam is a religion of peace and equality; how does that tally
with some of what the Koran says?
What
makes such anxieties really toxic is the feeling that they are
suppressed and ignored by our government. Critics of Islam,
however reasonable, know they are likely to fall foul of the
many new Labour laws against freedom of expression, in particular
against incitement to religious hatred, which was enacted under
Muslim pressure.
Yet
despite these laws, which silence critics of Islam, Muslims
are allowed to teach views that are illegal in public mosques.
The awkward truth is that certain teachings in the Koran are
against the law in this country teachings about homosexuality
and the position of women, for example. In some places the Koran
and some other Muslim teachings are sexist, homophobic and likely
to incite religious hatred.
The
Telegraph states: "Geert Wilders may be obnoxious,
but he was elected; Lord Ahmed was not. Lord Ahmed claims
that Wilders is guilty of incitement. He isn't. Being obnoxious
is not a criminal offence. To find someone guilty of incitement,
you need to show that they, you know, incited someone. Some
of the preachers that Wilders excoriates are guilty of incitement
in this sense, but this never seems to impede their entry and
re-entry into the UK. No doubt in future all members of the
Saudi Arabia ruling class will be denied entry, too. They do
not call for the banning of the Bible and outlawing of Christian
worship in their kingdom - they have done it. "
Melanie
Phillips of the Spectator says: "So lets get
this straight. The British government allows people to march
through British streets screaming support for Hamas, it allows
Hizb ut Tahrir to recruit on campus for the jihad against Britain
and the west, it takes no action against a Muslim peer who threatens
mass intimidation of Parliament, but it bans from the country
a member of parliament of a European democracy who wishes to
address the British Parliament on the threat to life and liberty
in the west from religious fascism.
It is
he, not them, who is considered a serious threat to one
of the fundamental interests of society. Why? Because
the result of this stand for life and liberty against those
who would destroy them might be an attack by violent thugs.
The response is not to face down such a threat of violence but
to capitulate to it instead.
Wilders
is a controversial politician, to be sure. But this is another
fateful and defining issue for Britains governing class
as it continues to sleepwalk into cultural suicide. If British
MPs do not raise hell about this banning order, if they go along
with this spinelessness, if they fail to stand up for the principle
that the British Parliament of all places must be free to hear
what a fellow democratically elected politician has to say about
one of the most difficult and urgent issues of our time, if
they fail to hold the line against the threat of violence but
capitulate to it instead, they will be signaling that Britain
is no longer the cradle of freedom and democracy but its graveyard."
The
Independent in an editorial says: "Joan Smith: Free
speech has to be for all, Home Secretary. Let's start by getting
a couple of things clear: Jacqui Smith is an idiot for banning
Geert Wilders, and even more of an idiot to do it after the
Government was lobbied to ban him by Lord Ahmed. The Home Secretary's
argument for refusing to admit Mr Wilders again (he was here
in December) is feeble; the only way his presence might threaten
public security is if there was an intemperate reaction by people
who don't like his views. Demands for a ban are based on the
same perverse reasoning that led to Salman Rushdie's being accused
of having "blood on his hands" by Lord Ahmed
because some idiots chose to respond violently to his
novel The Satanic Verses. According to this sophistry, it isn't
someone's fault if he loses his temper and hits me; it's mine
for upsetting him in the first place. It's
got so bad that when Channel 4's documentary Undercover Mosque
showed imams preaching hate in British mosques, the Crown Prosecution
Service and the West Midlands Police began investigating the
film-makers, coming to their senses only when they found themselves
on the wrong end of a libel action. I don't like Mr Wilders'
politics, but he doesn't advocate killing people, unlike Sheikh
Qaradawi, who was allowed into this country until someone belatedly
noticed that he supports suicide-bombing."
Stephen
Pollard of the Jewish Chronicle writes: "On February
23, Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch in the House of Lords for
a man going by the name of Israel Shamir. Israel Shamir
is, in fact, a Swedish-domiciled anti-Semite also known as Jöran
Jermas. The gist of Shamir - Jermass speech at the meeting
can be gleaned from its title, Jews and the Empire.
It included observations such as: All the [political]
parties are Zionist-infiltrated. Your newspapers
belong to Zionists . . . Jews indeed own, control and edit a
big share of mass media, this mainstay of Imperial thinking.
In the Middle East we have just one reason for wars, terror
and trouble and that is Jewish supremacy drive"
Why would Lord Ahmed have hosted such a man in the Lords, asks
Pollard?
Ahmed
did nothing to dissociate himself from Shamir and to this day
must, we assume, be proud of having issues his invitation.
So
that gives us a pretty good idea of what he considers acceptable.
There were no meetings with whips or leaders. There were no
demonstrations. The meeting was not cancelled.
I
think it's pretty clear where we Jews and Christians stand with
Lord Ahmed now.
Clearly
Lord Ahmed is selective about the types of free speech he chooses
to condemn."
Great Britain, famous for appeasing Adolph Hitler a half century
ago, is appeasing today all those who seek to replace English
law with Islamic Sharia law.
"We
will not allow a second Holocaust to materialize," says
Lester. "We will not allow history to repeat itself. We
will not allow Lord Ahmed to spit on the greatness of British
law, freedom and democracy."
Related
sites:
Remove
Lord Ahmed From The UK House of Lords - Preserve Democracy
The
above news content was edited and SEO optimized in Israel for
the Internet by the Leyden Communications Internet Marketing
SEO Group - Israel, London, New York.

Support
Israel with a Birthday Card!