Israel's War on Palestinian Terrorism, Barbarism
By Joel Leyden Jerusalem----May 14,
2004....Who's winning the war? And to make matters
worse, we here in Israel obsess about "body parts". We are engaged in
two wars - a bloody, sweaty battle of bullets and a real-time digital
media war of words. One must take a very
close, objective look at Israel's present PR efforts to understand why
we have and continue to lose. These are but a few
questions. Israel's approach
with both weapons and words has never worked. As for the war of bullets, yes Israel is stronger, more potent and Israel knows that it must use overwhelming force to win a war. But what kind of military force? During some of Israel's
more recent conflicts, the IDF has used to a very limited degree psychological
operations - PsyOps. And when the IDF has used PsyOps in combat, she has
been more than successful. Israel's successful conclusion of the Palestinian
terror siege of Bethlehem's Church of Nativity is one fine example. Islamic Jihad destroyed
an Israeli APC in Gaza with a missile just days ago. To win this war we must play by the same rules as our enemy. Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Hamas and Fatah are no different than their brothers who decapitated the heads of Wall Street Journalist Daniel Pearl and US businessman Nick Berg. With both Pearl and Berg, they didn't just kill them. They posed them, filmed them, decapitated them and uploaded the footage knowing that the Western world, which plays by different rules of combat, would see it within twenty-four hours. They sawed off Nick Berg's head and held it in front of a camera. It wasn't just an execution, it was a statement. A man's severed head was used as a prop in the war of the words.. The tension as the five hooded terrorists stood behind the Cornell graduate turned telecommunications entrepreneur was difficult to bear, knowing how horribly the vignette would end. Seeing the Jewish American Berg thrown down and brutalized was even more difficult. The plaintive screams, the pool of blood, the sawing across his neck and the ongoing religious chanting in the background repulsed us in a way that we cannot articulate. The one thing that we remember was seeing his lifeless head held in front of the camera and then to see it placed, on his corpse as the camera continued to roll. There was something unspeakably grotesque and unfathomable sad about his head being used to make a political argument. Was this event any different from when the English decapitated Oliver Cromwell in 1658 and placed his head on exhibit for several years for all in London to see? Yes, today we have the Internet and the power of electronic communications which easily finds its way to the masses, into our homes, offices and finally the voting booth. What have Israelis learned from the barbaric lynching of two Israel Defense Force reservists in Rahmallah? What have we learned from the Passover Massacre in Netanya and the countless buses and restaurants which have been torn apart? At this very moment
Israel is pouring more troops into Gaza. Yes, we need to widen the Philadelphia security corridor so that Palestinians will think twice before digging more weapons smuggling tunnels, but we also need to concentrate on the mental, emotional side of war. Almost a year ago, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon told his cabinet that Israel needed to confront the war of words in a more effective manner. The task for creating a special governmental public relations committee integrated with private international PR professionals was given to Cabinet Secretary Israel Maimon. Maimon was given 45 days to create a plan. That plan was never delivered nor implemented. Our enemies are smart.
They don't need tanks and F-16s. All they need is a computer to upload
images which will shock you. Images and soundbytes that will make you
fear them more than they fear us. To create a consensus to retreat from
Gaza for all of the wrong reasons. The US was very much on point when they opened the Iraqi war with an expensive and well thought out hi-tech "shock and awe" show of smart bombs hitting their targets in Baghdad. As a military strategy, it is discussed at length in a 1996 book published by the Command and Control Research Program (CCRP) within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense of the United States. Titled Shock and Awe: Achieving Rapid Dominance, the book describes shock and awe as a strategy "aimed at influencing the will, perception, and understanding of an adversary rather than simply destroying military capability." In this respect, shock and awe bears a striking similarity to terrorism as propaganda, in which psychological rather than material dominance is viewed as a primary war objective. (The terrorist attacks of September 11 also induced "shock and awe" in the U.S. population.) We don't need to
display the heads of Palestinians to win this war. The film "Apocalypse Now" embraced and disclosed the horrors of contemporary warfare and the realities to end it. It illustrated distinctions in combat culture. Actor Marlon Brando who played a fictitious and genius Colonel Kurtz, was portrayed as a "madman" who used the heads of the enemy as a determent. Kurtz was playing the same game as the Viet Cong, using barbarism to strike fear into the hearts and minds of the Viet Cong and win. The US was too politically correct with its clean Amnesty International and Peace Now movements to accept these tactics. So in the movie, Kurtz was assassinated by another US soldier and in real life America lost the war. Where is Israel's "shock and awe". Where is the creation of Israel's governmental PR committee which would be responsible for coordinating this action and following it up with effective soundbytes, spokespeople and Internet images? Why is the Nick Berg video the number one request on the Net, when it should be images of the four Jewish girls who were shot through the head last week in execution style. Tali Hatuel, who was eight months pregnant, had been driving her car towards a Gaza settlement when Islamic Palestinian terrorists opened fire on the car with automatic weapons. In the panic, she lost control and lurched off the road. The two Palestinian terrorists from Gaza rushed towards her firing their automatic rifles, shooting through the windows at point blank range. There was no chance of escape for the 34-year-old Israeli mother or her young, crying children Hila, 11, Hadar, nine, Roni, seven, and Merav, two. The Jewish children were still strapped to their child seats as the terrorists pumped two bullets into each of their heads to confirm their "kill." When Israeli rescue workers arrived they found the car riddled with bullets, the carpets, the children's books and toys drenched in blood. Yasser Arafat responded
to the Jewish children's murder speaking of peace and of Israeli war crimes
in English as he continued to beg Palestinian children to become suicide
bombers in Arabic. The proverbial wolfe in sheep's clothing. Fine PR tactics,
really brilliant. In the world of commercial marketing we call this "localized
messaging, demographic branding." It's a professional strategy which
wins. Where are Israel's
props? Yes, we have killed Yassin and Rantisi. Yes, Israel has dropped leaflets by air in Gaza. That was a good start. But we need to impress the Palestinian mind much further, much deeper that if they wish to destroy this tiny, beautiful democratic Jewish state, they will suffer countless nightmares. We are already accused by the United Nations and our many Arab enemies of committing atrocities every hour. What do we have to lose? Do we truly believe that Amnesty International and those UN member states which are supported by Arab petrol dollars will be our friends tomorrow? To win this war we must play by the same rules as our enemy. The Americans in 1776, who were greatly outnumbered, did not walk in open formation when they entered the battlefield. They took cover from behind trees and rocks, ambushed by night and changed the rules of warfare. They were called cowards by the Brits but in the end, the creative "cowards" won the war. The British, who out of collective pride could not adapt, lost. We don't need to display the heads of Palestinians to win this war. What we do need is the immediate, urgent action of Ariel Sharon to deliver his promise of creating a professional, effective governmental PR apparatus which would be directly under his control with private, professional, crisis media logistical consultancy support. It is time for Islamic
terrorists and the populations which support them to fear us more than
we fear them.
Jerusalem-----October 2001......Since the below report was written, Israel's
Ministry for Foreign Affairs has taken action to retain international
PR professionals, but is still ignoring Israel's professional and creative
home base of International PR pros. We applaud the FM for this limited
action. The FM has also been criticized by the Israeli media for not responding
quick enough to fast breaking news. They have also responded to this observation
by having their own people serve as spokesmen 24/7. The MFA has a severely
limited PR budget and this remains as the largest obstacle for Ministry
to perform properly. The MFA needs to retain local, professional crisis communications public relations consultants to assist them with media coaching so that their appearance on CNN, Sky News, BBC and other media outlets appears professional and confident. Foreign
Ministry Retains Rubenstein Associates for Public Relations Jerusalem----July
31.....The Israeli Foreign Ministry, which is officially responsible for
Israel's image, has repeatedly failed to obtain the most professional
public relations counsel and strategy for the country. In it's latest
action, the MFA has retained Rubenstein Associates in New York City. Rubenstein
is one of the most professional agencies in the world and is the agency
of record for which this editor transferred his New York public relations
practice prior to making Aliya. The MFA goes on the assumption that if you work in Israel - how good can you be? They are seduced by the towering skyscrapers and financial reach of New York while ignoring some of the most professional PR consultants in their own country. Israeli public relations consultants who have proven their salt by penetrating international markets and helping to establish the Israeli Hi-Tech industry as a global force. It was with great hesitation that the INA has come to reveal some of the flaws of the MFA, as we do not make a policy of washing our laundry in public. At the same time - the MFA has refused to even meet with PR professionals living and working in the same country! While other Ministries have approached International Israeli PR firms, in desperation, as the economy of the country deepens and thousands of employed become unemployed. The PR professionals of Israel can no longer afford the luxury or political correctness of being silent. Take a quick look at the MFA's deeply flawed strategy. They are focusing on the colors of M-16's to tell the world media that Israel is firing rubber bullets - while missing the forest for the trees. Israeli combat commando units are highly effective because they are small, quick moving, highly flexible, knowledgeable of local and foreign intelligence and have the ability to respond immediately. So why not apply the same modus operandi to critical public relations activity? How much does Rubenstein
know about Israel and the Middle-East? How can a New York based PR firm react to a real time crisis here in Israel? They can't - and by the time they do, the journalists and photographers have filed the story they are looking for, mostly from a Palestinian perspective. The solution to Israel's
fatal and failing public relations is as follows: retain the best and
most successful bicultural PR pros in Israel and use them to coordinate
a 24x7 global emergency crisis rapid response network. These professionals
know the Israeli government offices, the culture, the logistics and the
foreign press corps which files the stories that appear in New York, Paris
and Tokyo. The MFA is still reacting rather than be being proactive in
it's public relations approach. Why must we always be placed in a defensive
posture handling damage control after the story has been printed? For now we are relying
upon a greatly respected but foreign PR agency which only knows the New
York Yankees. What we presently
have is the same weak and faulty system which was asleep during and after
the Dolpernarium terrorist bombing in Tel Aviv. |