In
Defense Of Israel IDF Chief Dan Halutz
By
Joel Leyden
Israel
News Agency
Jerusalem----August
16......Israel is at war. No, I'm not talking about Hezbollah or Lebanon, but
at war with itself. And at the wrong time.
Israel
Defence Force (IDF) Chief of Staff Dan Halutz made headlines in an Israel daily
newspaper Ma'ariv which accused Halutz of placing his own personal finances
before the security of the country. That as soldiers were dying, he took the time
to call his stock broker.
That Halutz knew that a war was imminent so he sold
his stock portfolio.
Halutz
responded by calling the newspaper report "baseless" and "evil." "I don't know
who is behind this and I do not plan to be dragged into a debate over my personal
integrity," he told reporters during a briefing in his Tel Aviv office. "I am
also a citizen and I have my own household."
Halutz
is correct. He is a citizen, has his own household and is a human being. But he
is also the Israel Chief of Staff, so when he gives an order, eats food or merely
goes to to the bathroom - all is magnified.
There
are many versions going around today as to when Halutz placed that two
minute call to his stock broker.
In a newspaper interview given to journalist Sima Kadmon of the Israel daily Yediot
Ahronot, Halutz explained he had issued the instructions to call his broker
in the morning, before the Israel Lebanon Hezbollah border raid, which resulted
in the kidnapping and deaths of the eight IDF soldiers. Further, the call had
only come through before the crisis began. 'I can understand the criticism,'
Halutz admitted to Kadmon, 'and in retrospect, had I thought about it back then
twice perhaps I might have acted differently.'
IDF
Deputy Chief of Staff Moshe Kaplinsky has expressed his support for Israel Defense
Forces Chief Dan Halutz, slamming criticism leveled at him in the wake of reports
he sold his investment portfolio at noon on July 12 - the day the Hezbollah war
broke out.
"It's
sad. There's no reason he shouldn't continue at his post, said Kaplinsky." "I
was with him from the first moment they reported the abduction (of the two IDF
soldiers.) I went down to the command center three minutes after him and I saw
how he managed affairs with professionalism and level-headedness," Kaplinsky said.
"I saw the decisions he made, his mental and later physical investment…to say
that he was dealing with other things looks to me like completely unrelated to
reality."
"I
know it may look bad," the deputy army chief said, referring to Halutz's order
to sell his shares, but added: "We must remember that even at the general staff
headquarters during (significant) incidents we have the time for some technical
matters. So one moment you reply to a phone call, and another moment you arrange
something else – it happens to each one of us." Kaplinsky also rejected out of
hand hints that the army chief sold his investment portfolio because he knew a
war was about to break out that was sure to lead to a stock exchange collapse.
"At noon none of us knew we're going to war, I promise that," he said. "At that
phase we were dealing with the question of how deep we'll attack Hizbullah targets…the
picture cleared only late at night." 'I'm completely at peace with his decisions'
Turning
his attention to nameless senior IDF officers who called for Halutz to resign,
Kaplinsky said: "It's very easy to criticize, certainly when it's anonymous. Which
senior officers are we talking about? If there's someone who thinks the chief
of staff should resign, he should get up and say that." "I saw his ability to
take decisions during those difficult times," Kaplinsky added. "There were very
difficult decisions and I’m not sure others would take them as quickly as he did."
Israel
Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman MK Tzahi Hanegbi (Kadima)
expressed support for Halutz. "I am personally hesitant to make judgments regarding
the Chief of General Staff's financial actions in the last couple of days," he
said. "I am certain that other members of the committee share my views. There
is a sense that instead of an Israeli culture, we have developed a culture similar
to that of French colonial guillotine executors, making quick verdicts fashionable."
What's
wrong with this picture? Several Israel newspapers and many senior IDF commanders
and elected officials are calling for Halutz to resign now.
Resign
at this very moment without the conclusions of an investigative committee?
If
something wrong was performed, where is due process?
As
a professional journalist, PR consultant who has worked in crisis communications
for 25 years, it sounds more like someone else in government is thinking of their
own job security at the wrong time. Thinking of their own personal career over
Israel's security.
Israel's
war with Hezbollah, Lebanon, Syria and Iran is still ongoing. What we have is
a fragile cease-fire in place for which Hezbollah has no intention of keeping.
Hezbollah, according to UN resolution 1701 had to return kidnapped soldiers. They
have not. Hezbollah was supposed to lay down their arms. They refused. Hezbollah
was supposed to move out of south Lebanon to positions of north of the Litani
River. They remain 50 meters from the Israel northern town of Metulla.
Yet,
people are seeking to strip Israel of its control and command at this critical
time.
Halutz
has broken no laws. He made a simple phone call to his broker as millions of other
people made that day. Did Halutz cancel meetings because of this phone call? Did
he leave his post? Hey, let's take it one step further did he have sex with his
wife that night? Did other elected officials and IDF commanders have sex with
their wives that day or night? If so, we should ask all of them to resign as well.
For they put their hormones before the security of the state. Can we get more
absurd?
Halutz
did no wrong. He thought about his family as a responsible father and husband.
As the Mossad is famous for saying: "take care of yourself first before you
can take care of others." Halutz multi-tasked between work and family. We
all do. It is not a crime. It is natural . It should not be mentioned or condemned.
In fact, I'm pleased that he cleared his desk of all and any personal concerns.
Halutz
has expressed no regret over the timing of the sale, saying he has finances to
manage like any other Israeli. "They've turned me into Shylock," said Halutz.
What Israeli, what human being does not think about their personal finances?
It was not as if Halutz had
ran out of the situation room in search of his stock broker.
What
worries this writer, is that we now see a pool of calls for Halutz's immediate
resignation. Yet, the country is still at war. Hezbollah has rockets right on
the Israel border, Gaza is far from quiet, and Syria and Iran have missiles pointed
at Tel Aviv.
If
a chorus of politicians in Jerusalem and a mass of IDF infantry commanders choose
to hang Halutz, do so for his failure (if it is his failure) at the end of
the war if he has not secured the return of our kidnapped soldiers. For not
stopping a hail of Katushas from pouring on Kiryat Shmona, Haifa and Nahariya.
For not pushing Hezbollah north of the Litani. Halutz's decision to rely heavily
on air strikes in the first phase of the war (which is a normal, correct strategy
in the opening phases of any conflict. It softens up enemy forces for a ground
invasion.) To begin a massive ground offensive just as a cease-fire deal was within
reach. More than 30 Israeli soldiers died after the U.N. Security Council had
already approved the truce deal. Do not attack Halutz for merely being an arrogant
IAF combat fighter. That goes with being an Israeli pilot. Nor criticize him for
never having driven a tank or steered a submarine.
One
must ask the question: "who benefits the most from Halutz resigning right
now?"
First, it would be a newspaper called Ma'ariv which is placing
its circulation above the security of Israel. And second, some paranoid politicians
who are seeking escape goats.
Lastly, our enemies would benefit. Israel has
neither won or nor lost this war yet. But with many running to judge in Olympic
speed, you would think that the war is over and that we did lose.
Is
that the message we choose to send to Hezbollah, Lebanon, Iran and Syria at this
hour?
Finish
the war. Then investigate all that went wrong. Give IDF Chief of Staff Amnon Lipkin-Shahak,
who was just appointed to chair a commission of inquiry into the army's conduct
before and during the war against Hizbullah, some time. Then speak to me about
jealousies between IDF ground forces and the Israel Air Force. Or about a phone
call to one's broker or a kiss to one's wife.
In
a speech to the Israel Knesset, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert admitted that "there
were mistakes made," and promised that "we will examine everything that needs
examination." But he added the caveat that "we won't sink into blame and guilt.
We don't have that luxury. We must assure that next time - and there may be a
next time - things will be done better."
Yes,
many "things" need to be improved. A call to one stock broker is not
a "mistake." Lack of proper logistics at the start of the war would
be a mistake. Not taking out all of Hezbollah's Katusha launchers (over 200 fell
on Israel the day before the cease-fire) would be a mistake. And I can discuss
the public relations and media flaws of the IDF Spokesperson's Office for hours.
But this is not the time.
Last
question. Who gave Ma'ariv a negative story about Israel's Chief of Staff
in the middle of a war?
That is the question we should all be asking.